data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05eaf/05eaf454d0c5412affc273555a75ef755694282f" alt=":jap: :jap:"
Tu as des points comparaison avec toi, même de l'entrée de gamme ?
Eh bien en fait si, pas de pb pour les mettre mais avec le fit super serré j'ai bcp de pression dans les oreilles et je n'arrive pas à m'en débarrasser, du coup je fini par avoir mal au crâne et l'impression que les yeux vont sortir de leur orbite lol.Vic a écrit :AH ben voilà, donc même pas besoin de les retourner !
Td310 a écrit :Avec l'accord de Piotr, je colle une partie du mail :
"Comparing to NT6... Hmm... F3 is not as aggressive - I find NT6 to be a little bit too hot in treble region. F3's highs are more about the highest of the frequencies rather than the piercing 6kHz range what makes it rather untypical approach in IEM world.
NT6 has more "grain" in midrange and vocals are not as smooth or easy going. NT6 might have an advantage in slightly bigger overall headroom giving it a little bit more depth and bass body - but that's from vague memory of NT6. Detail retrieval is at least on par.
For me the NT6 is unfortunately one of those IEMs that has rather dry sound it might be too neutral for my personal taste. F3 has fully immersive sound while not loosing any details.
It's not champion of "neutral" but it's not coloring either, it's just that one tiny bit above "etymotic flat bass" - enough to give you palpable feeling but not enough to be considered thick or boomy".