FIIO M3

[cvanquick]

oui nano ou fuze mais plus épais.

le plenue D est à 300 €, le fiio M3 à 60 €. il y a forcément un gap sur pas mal de points.

sinon quand il a fini de lire un album il passe automatiquement au suivant.

[cvanquick]

hier 1h20 de course à pied avec le petiot. Impeccable et belle réserve de puissance.
En plus comme il passe à l'album suivant quand le précédent est fini, je suis tranquille. Je me colle dans mon dossier et roule ma poule

Aujourd'hui, petit tour chez COBRASON pour session casque:

- shure 940, drivé sans problème. Association dynamique mais plutôt droite et sèche. tous les registres sont bien là mais pas beaucoup de corp.
- T70p, même remarque que pour le shore. Donc si vous aimez du tonus, de la droiture et pas trop de corpulence, avec ces deux là c'est tout bon.
- Shure 1840, pas mal mais ambiance extérieure trop bruyante pour jugement définitif
- Focal spirit (PRO et CLASSIC), bien drivé et belle association. Le DAP et le casque s'équilibre. C'est vraiment bon mais pas pour moi. Avec mes portugaises le casque est entre le circum et le supra donc fit moyen.
- Utrasone PRO 900, la patate chaude. Drivé sans problème. Grosse pêche et gros bas du spectre. Pas fan du bas mais si tu aimes, ca marche tout seul avec la signature plutôt droite du Fiio
- après, test hérétique: sony MDR-Z7. drivé sans problème par le microbe ( ). Très belle association. En mettant l'EQ en personnalisé zéro partout, ça se tien vraiment. Ca donne un ensemble à la sonorité très smooth mais pas molle pour autant.
C'est pas nomade pour un sou mais alors ce confort de casque et ce couple

[Kooka]

- après, test hérétique: sony MDR-Z7. drivé sans problème par le microbe (  8-D ).  Très belle association. En mettant l'EQ en personnalisé zéro partout, ça se tien vraiment. Ca donne un ensemble à la sonorité très smooth mais pas molle pour autant.
C'est pas nomade pour un sou mais alors ce confort de casque et ce couple  :'(  :(l)

Dans la lignée du MDR-1R ?

[cvanquick]

On peut dire ça mais avec une présence
Je pense qu'il devrait te plaire
Mais attention voilà ce que j'ai trouvé sur head-fi:

"Pros: Sound, Bass(Quality and Quantity), Soundsatge, Scale of Sound, Bulid Quality
Cons: High quality protein leather it may be within an hour your pink bits will get moist. Headband padding too soft. Replacement earpads not available.

PLEASE READ THE WHOLE REVIEW TO GET WHAT I'M TRYING TO SAY.

Atleast 250 hours of break-in is required to open up the bass extension and midrange. Burn in is a controversial subject but the Z7 absolutely NEEDS it to sound its best. The Z7 sounds a bit thin and string instruments and piano lack the proper weight when you first start listening to music.

HOW DO THEY PERFORM(not sound)

You know it when you hear it -- the MDR-Z7 just sounds right. The balance of bass, midrange and treble is as smooth as can be, the stereo soundstage is very spacious, and dynamic range is, well, dynamic. What I'm saying here is the MDR-Z7 is for audiophiles who want to hear the sound as accurately as possible, so there's no jacked-up bass or zippy treble -- the MDR-Z7 just tells it like it is. It's also one of the more comfortable over-the-ear headphones around, so you can listen longer without fatigue.

Body and Soul is what separates the Z7 from other cans. There's more substance to the sound, more body, balanced with remarkable resolution of fine detail. This headphone sounds fuller, grander, bigger and richer than the HD650. The Z7 is downright soulful, and this may sound strange, but it makes digital recordings sound more like analog recordings, and that's a complement.

The Z7 pulled me further inside Adele's 25 CD than the HD650 did. HD650 sounds clear and clean but it was also ruthless in revealing that Adele's latest album is not at all well mastered plus it sounded thinner and insubstantial. I preferred the Z7's sweeter tonal balance. It's a more romantic flavor, and voices sound especially natural, Adele's million years ago sounded absolutely FANTASTIC. This is a better song than Hello IMHO.

This tells us one important fact about the Z7: The Z7 glosses over harshness and artefacts in OK sources and presents the recordings in the best manner possible. With the HD650 Adels's 25 was not enjoyable at all plus it sounded thin(not in a good way) and this was a constant with almost all modern contemporary music. If you mostly listen to well-recorded acoustic music the extra crispness of the 650 will not be a problem , but if you're more into pop, rock or any mainstream music, the HD650's extra crispness has a downside. It lets you hear much more clearly how compressed and harsh a lot of that music sounds.

The MDR-Z7' approach makes even harsh recordings enjoyable .Put another way, the MDR-Z7 takes just enough of the edge off to tame the harshest recordings but still has excellent clarity and crispness to let great recordings shine. After only a fairly brief period of listening, it seemed increasingly clear that the larger drivers(70mm) in the Z7 might well reach 3Hz in some meaningless sense but where they are doing something more useful is giving the Sony an refinement that many rival designs can’t emulate.

The refined nature of the Z7 means that although it is exceptionally good with great recordings, it makes a commendable job with material that is less polished. The performance with Spotify was perfectly listenable and the Z7 has to be fed a fairly compressed signal before it becomes truly unhappy.

Next I moved on to Pink Floyd's DSOT MoFi recordings and with these the HD650 was very enjoyable but when I moved to the Sony it absolutely killed any brief romance I had going on with the HD650.

Sony makes great play of high res in the promo material for the Z7 and by way of justification of this, the Z7 responds to the better mastering and higher bitrates of high res to good effect. If you have material that is well mastered, the Sony is a seriously talented partner to explore this connection with. The Z7’s ability to produce real scale and soundstage is richly rewarded by higher quality material.

As I have suspected before at times, the difference is the mastering not the sample rate - great 16/44.1kHz files are equally impressive - but as record labels generally try and make the effort when selling high res files to master them properly, this is a good source of really finding out what the Z7 is capable of. Their ability to handle large scale material is excellent as well.

There is a realism and tangibility to the way the Sony recreates music that is both consistent and consistently good.

Now we come to the important part: Here is what I discovered after spending 6 months with the Z7.

Where some cans, most notably the Senns and HifiMans, focus on an almost hyper-precise sound of pristine clarity and purity, others tend more toward a warm, inviting, hearty, and organic sound. The Z7 falls in that latter camp, but with two important twists. First, unlike other warmth-orientated cans, the Z7 in no way sounds softly focussed, or lacking in resolution or detail. On the contrary, its focus is tack-sharp and its ability to resolve fine textural and transient details is fully competitive with the best in its genre.

Second, and again unlike many other organic-sounding cans, the Z7 does not soften, underplay, or round off either transient sounds or dynamic contrasts in the music. Instead, the Z7 renders transient sounds with sharply defined (although never exaggerated) leading edges, while also giving dynamic contrasts, including crescendos and decrescendos large and small, their full due

HOW DO THEY SOUND...

I was looking for an organic sounding full size headphone that was easy to drive and worked well with portable sources so b4 buying a can I researched a lot and zeroed in on the Z7. I read multiple reviews b4 buying the Z7 and all of them stated that it is a sensitive can and works well with portable sources and it does so I went ahead and bought one.

Do they work well with portable sources like DAP's and cell phones... yes they do but and its a big BUT.....

From the outset, few aspects of the Sony’s performance are immediately noticeable. These are extremely sensitive headphones considering their driver size and genuinely refined and considering that the Z7 is not open backed, very open and spacious.

Under amped the Z7 sounded clean and authoritative. The bass is tight, but noticeably more full(thick) than I was used to with other cans that the Z7 had displaced. Upper bass, too, was powerful and well articulated, and while the midrange and treble were smooth and unaggressive, the overall impression was of a warm, rich, powerful sound. Transients could be startlingly dynamic, but there was a lack of snap and sparkle unless I really turned up the volume.

I thoroughly enjoyed listening to the Z7 for a few weeks through my DAP, but I was troubled by the soundstage limitations and, increasingly, by the abiding warmth of the Z7 tonal balance. Some might describe the Z7's sound as smooth, unaggressive, and rich; it certainly was all of that, but those characteristics were also constant, in that they were imposed on all sources. It seemed hard to believe that such a sound, however much it might appeal to some tastes, could be acceptable for a brand's flagship audiophile headphone. Clearly, some experimentation was called for in amplification, DAC and cabling

I replaced the DX90, a lovely DAP to be sure, with a Conductor Virtuoso(don't know why I tried this earlier), and connected the latter to my PC with an AQ Coffee USB cable.

All of my listening was done with JRMC 19 and jPlay feeding the USB inputs of a Conductor Virtuoso. Burson Conductor Virtuoso ESS Sabre is rated at 4W output into 16 ohms, so power was not an issue.

WOW. With the Conductor Virtuoso, the Z7 sound was still recognizable, but the headphones sounded as if they'd been cured of head colds. The other thing that occurred to me was that, the soundstage was wider and soo big. Now to reconsider . . .It didn't take special effort to recognize that the Z7's wonderfully articulate bass and lower midrange were well proportioned to a cleanly detailed upper midrange and extended treble. This new musical balance made listening a toe-tapping pleasure. When properly amped the sensitive nature gives the Z7 a pleasantly open performance and there is a sense of effortlessness to the way it goes about making music that is extremely pleasant.

The Z7 had full extended bass but not disproportionately so, yet that bass is clean and precise all the way up to the midrange. For relishing the intricacies of the scoring for lower strings and brass I have not heard the Sony's equal. Sure, it may not have gone as low as some bigger speakers or subwoofers, but it conveyed all the requisite weight of percussion instruments without obscuring any detail. The Z7's midrange clarity was similarly impressive—I could hear intimate musical details that, through lesser headphones, were not so apparent/lost.

I could no longer delay the expected gratification of hearing Mozart's piano sonatas. No disappointment. This was truly wonderful, and probably the best and most enjoyable reproduction of an acoustic piano in headphones that I've heard.

I had anticipated that I would still find the Sony's extreme treble muted, but that bias was easily dispelled, treble was present in balance to the rest of the sound.

If the Z7 have a fault, it was not in dynamics or transient response. These headphones can be startling, especially if I foolishly began with the level a bit too high. Somehow, the Z7 always let me know when the volume setting for the music I was playing was not just right. If I set it too high, I got a punch in the face. If I set it too low, the sparkle and presence noticeably dimmed. I haven't had this with any other headphone.

Compared to the HD650, the Z7 distinguished itself with its strong, explicit low end, massive scale of sound and the soft, silky smoothness of its treble. Both of these models have a detailed midrange, but the Senns have less heft, even when heft was demanded by the recording. Dynamics for me were better on the Z7.

The Senns and Z7 were capable of throwing big soundstages that seemed to nearly wrap around my head but they both presented the music differently. It is thus impossible to say which of these headphones offered a more accurate depiction of the original recorded event. My preference leans towards the Sony MDR Z7 as the most truthful presentation

CONCLUSION

The Sony MDR-Z7 is an impressive headphone. Mated to suitable amplification, it offers honest, organic and detailed sound.
FOR ME it joins a select group of accurate and enjoyable headphones.
Sony has made another statement product. Much more exciting though is that this product harks back to the Sony of old. This is a products that goes its own way in engineering and technology and is peerlessly built. From an audio perspective, this is the sort of engineering that is exciting and singular enough to make one become a fanboy all over again."

[bakdus]

Possible d'avoir un résume en Français pour les inculte de langue de shakespeare comme moi.

Merci

[cvanquick]

Le rendu sonore est dépendant de l'amplification.

Sous amplifié il sera plutôt autoritaire et directe avec du corps dans le bas du spectre et une scène plus restreinte.
Correctement amplifié, il délivre un son organique, détaillé et juste

[cvanquick]

le M3 ne l'amplifie pas correctement mais permet une écoute qualitative quand même.

[tinara]

Possible d'avoir un résume en Français pour les inculte de langue de shakespeare comme moi.

Merci

Coucou, tu veux voir ma... trad ?

"Pros: Sound, Bass(Quality and Quantity), Soundsatge, Scale of Sound, Bulid Quality
Cons: High quality protein leather it may be within an hour your pink bits will get moist. Headband padding too soft. Replacement earpads not available.

Professionnels de la mode : Le casque fait du son, des basses qualités et des basses quantités, Soundsatge [NDLT : désolé, on ne fait pas la correction orthographique pour l'espace sonore], Escabeau de son, Bulid Quality [NDLT : désolé, on ne connait que la Deutsche Qualität pas le Bulidistan].
Cons : Le cuir et la moustache nourrit la protéine de haute qualité va te mouiller le petit bout rose. Les chauves vont avoir un bandeau tout doux sur le crâne. On ne peut pas remplacer les oreilles de l'utilisateur ni les éléments y attenant comme les coussinets.

PLEASE READ THE WHOLE REVIEW TO GET WHAT I'M TRYING TO SAY.

Va falloir lire tout le bousin pour comprendre ce que j'essaie de ne pas dire. :sourisJerry:

Atleast 250 hours of break-in is required to open up the bass extension and midrange. Burn in is a controversial subject but the Z7 absolutely NEEDS it to sound its best. The Z7 sounds a bit thin and string instruments and piano lack the proper weight when you first start listening to music.

Merci d'abandonner votre casque dans un tiroir durant 250 heures pour ouvrir un peu les basses, les mediums et les fenêtres. Je sais que vous doutez que je doute que vous doutez de l'action de la brûlure intérieure mais c'est nécessaire parce que. De toutes façons, ça va mal sonner au début donc merci de ne pas écouter votre casque avant de l'avoir utilisé 250 heures.

HOW DO THEY PERFORM(not sound)

Comment qu'il est bien mais sans le son

You know it when you hear it -- the MDR-Z7 just sounds right. The balance of bass, midrange and treble is as smooth as can be, the stereo soundstage is very spacious, and dynamic range is, well, dynamic. What I'm saying here is the MDR-Z7 is for audiophiles who want to hear the sound as accurately as possible, so there's no jacked-up bass or zippy treble -- the MDR-Z7 just tells it like it is. It's also one of the more comfortable over-the-ear headphones around, so you can listen longer without fatigue.

C'est génial, il est parfait, rien est mis en avant, c'est fait pour les beaux gosses qui aiment quand c'est précis comme ça doit l'être, avec de l'espace et puis des transitions jazzy entre les deux. Puis, je peux l'écouter me faire la sérénade des heures sans la moindre fatigue.

Body and Soul is what separates the Z7 from other cans. There's more substance to the sound, more body, balanced with remarkable resolution of fine detail. This headphone sounds fuller, grander, bigger and richer than the HD650. The Z7 is downright soulful, and this may sound strange, but it makes digital recordings sound more like analog recordings, and that's a complement.

Le Z7 est le seul casque avec une putain d'âme ! Il est vivant, il a des sentiments et il est plus grand, plus gros, plus riche que le HD650 (on parle tant du son que de taille de jack). Il transforme aussi des CDs en vyniles parce qu'il est comme ça.

The Z7 pulled me further inside Adele's 25 CD than the HD650 did. HD650 sounds clear and clean but it was also ruthless in revealing that Adele's latest album is not at all well mastered plus it sounded thinner and insubstantial. I preferred the Z7's sweeter tonal balance. It's a more romantic flavor, and voices sound especially natural, Adele's million years ago sounded absolutely FANTASTIC. This is a better song than Hello IMHO.

Adele est plus bonne à 25 ans et avec le Z7 qu'elle ne l'était à 21 ans avec le HD650. En gros, le Z7 c'est un petit romantique qui peut accepter que le dernier album d'Adele est un mastering de manchot acrobate alors que le HD650 te fait bien comprendre qu'elle aurait dû changer de studio. Passage sur une chanson qui poutre Hello aussi. Hello ça veut dire Coucou mais de l'autre côté de l'océan.

This tells us one important fact about the Z7: The Z7 glosses over harshness and artefacts in OK sources and presents the recordings in the best manner possible. With the HD650 Adels's 25 was not enjoyable at all plus it sounded thin(not in a good way) and this was a constant with almost all modern contemporary music. If you mostly listen to well-recorded acoustic music the extra crispness of the 650 will not be a problem , but if you're more into pop, rock or any mainstream music, the HD650's extra crispness has a downside. It lets you hear much more clearly how compressed and harsh a lot of that music sounds.

On remet une couche sur la capacité du Z7 à te faire apprécier les sources mal-foutues là où le HD650 te met le nez dans la merde de l'ingé son, du producteur et de l'artiste pour te dire d'aller écouter de la folk.

The MDR-Z7' approach makes even harsh recordings enjoyable .Put another way, the MDR-Z7 takes just enough of the edge off to tame the harshest recordings but still has excellent clarity and crispness to let great recordings shine. After only a fairly brief period of listening, it seemed increasingly clear that the larger drivers(70mm) in the Z7 might well reach 3Hz in some meaningless sense but where they are doing something more useful is giving the Sony an refinement that many rival designs can’t emulate.

Comme le Z7 en a des grosses de 70 mm, il pourrait te faire vibrer les noreilles à 3 Hz mais au lieu de ça, ça lui permet d'être plus permissif sans être un sombre idiot et surtout te montrer qu'il est plus raffiné que les autres.

The refined nature of the Z7 means that although it is exceptionally good with great recordings, it makes a commendable job with material that is less polished. The performance with Spotify was perfectly listenable and the Z7 has to be fed a fairly compressed signal before it becomes truly unhappy.

En gros, faut vraiment donner que la merde au Z7 pour le ressentir que c'est pas vraiment une bonne idée d'avoir une piste aussi pourrie. Mais il est tranquillou sur Spotify, entre deux pubs, bande de pauvres. Et il est géniallissime génial sur les sources made in Germany [NDLT : Ca veut dire fait en Hallemagne comme la Badische Schneckensuppe ou les costumes bavarois]

Next I moved on to Pink Floyd's DSOT MoFi recordings and with these the HD650 was very enjoyable but when I moved to the Sony it absolutely killed any brief romance I had going on with the HD650.

Sony makes great play of high res in the promo material for the Z7 and by way of justification of this, the Z7 responds to the better mastering and higher bitrates of high res to good effect. If you have material that is well mastered, the Sony is a seriously talented partner to explore this connection with. The Z7’s ability to produce real scale and soundstage is richly rewarded by higher quality material.

As I have suspected before at times, the difference is the mastering not the sample rate - great 16/44.1kHz files are equally impressive - but as record labels generally try and make the effort when selling high res files to master them properly, this is a good source of really finding out what the Z7 is capable of. Their ability to handle large scale material is excellent as well.

There is a realism and tangibility to the way the Sony recreates music that is both consistent and consistently good.

Now we come to the important part: Here is what I discovered after spending 6 months with the Z7.

Where some cans, most notably the Senns and HifiMans, focus on an almost hyper-precise sound of pristine clarity and purity, others tend more toward a warm, inviting, hearty, and organic sound. The Z7 falls in that latter camp, but with two important twists. First, unlike other warmth-orientated cans, the Z7 in no way sounds softly focussed, or lacking in resolution or detail. On the contrary, its focus is tack-sharp and its ability to resolve fine textural and transient details is fully competitive with the best in its genre.

Second, and again unlike many other organic-sounding cans, the Z7 does not soften, underplay, or round off either transient sounds or dynamic contrasts in the music. Instead, the Z7 renders transient sounds with sharply defined (although never exaggerated) leading edges, while also giving dynamic contrasts, including crescendos and decrescendos large and small, their full due

Il dit qu'il voit pas le rapport. Et que le Z7 il a des transitoires parfaites qu'il est du côté organic [NDLT : Ca veut dire qu'il a un label bio], sympa, un peu chaudasse et surtout vachement alléchant. Il est pas comme les autres chaudasses pourtant, il manque pas de résolution, pas de détails et il est pas tout doux. Bref, il a écouté Pink Floyd aussi et c'est plus chouette qu'avec le HD650.

HOW DO THEY SOUND...

Tout ça pour te dire qu'il a pas encore parlé du son en vrai ! (Vous pouvez me rémunérer en écouteur-bouton et en Porta Pro pour les travaux de traduction. Je pose ça là)

I was looking for an organic sounding full size headphone that was easy to drive and worked well with portable sources so b4 buying a can I researched a lot and zeroed in on the Z7. I read multiple reviews b4 buying the Z7 and all of them stated that it is a sensitive can and works well with portable sources and it does so I went ahead and bought one.

Do they work well with portable sources like DAP's and cell phones... yes they do but and its a big BUT.....

From the outset, few aspects of the Sony’s performance are immediately noticeable. These are extremely sensitive headphones considering their driver size and genuinely refined and considering that the Z7 is not open backed, very open and spacious.

Under amped the Z7 sounded clean and authoritative. The bass is tight, but noticeably more full(thick) than I was used to with other cans that the Z7 had displaced. Upper bass, too, was powerful and well articulated, and while the midrange and treble were smooth and unaggressive, the overall impression was of a warm, rich, powerful sound. Transients could be startlingly dynamic, but there was a lack of snap and sparkle unless I really turned up the volume.

I thoroughly enjoyed listening to the Z7 for a few weeks through my DAP, but I was troubled by the soundstage limitations and, increasingly, by the abiding warmth of the Z7 tonal balance. Some might describe the Z7's sound as smooth, unaggressive, and rich; it certainly was all of that, but those characteristics were also constant, in that they were imposed on all sources. It seemed hard to believe that such a sound, however much it might appeal to some tastes, could be acceptable for a brand's flagship audiophile headphone. Clearly, some experimentation was called for in amplification, DAC and cabling

Il a lu des reviews avant de l'acheter et elles étaient bonnes. No Cake [NDLT : Il y en aura à la fin du texte]. On lui a dit que ça collait avec tout et qu'il était posé de le brancher au cul de n'importe quoi MAIS ... Il est pas d'accord. Il dit que c'est bien mais qu'il peut faire mieux si tu sors la grosse machine notamment au niveau du soundstage et le côté chèvre chaud de la balance tonale. (Ce qui est regrettable pour un poisson si avidement chassé pour être mangé cru)

I replaced the DX90, a lovely DAP to be sure, with a Conductor Virtuoso(don't know why I tried this earlier), and connected the latter to my PC with an AQ Coffee USB cable.

All of my listening was done with JRMC 19 and jPlay feeding the USB inputs of a Conductor Virtuoso. Burson Conductor Virtuoso ESS Sabre is rated at 4W output into 16 ohms, so power was not an issue.

WOW. With the Conductor Virtuoso, the Z7 sound was still recognizable, but the headphones sounded as if they'd been cured of head colds. The other thing that occurred to me was that, the soundstage was wider and soo big. Now to reconsider . . .It didn't take special effort to recognize that the Z7's wonderfully articulate bass and lower midrange were well proportioned to a cleanly detailed upper midrange and extended treble. This new musical balance made listening a toe-tapping pleasure. When properly amped the sensitive nature gives the Z7 a pleasantly open performance and there is a sense of effortlessness to the way it goes about making music that is extremely pleasant.

The Z7 had full extended bass but not disproportionately so, yet that bass is clean and precise all the way up to the midrange. For relishing the intricacies of the scoring for lower strings and brass I have not heard the Sony's equal. Sure, it may not have gone as low as some bigger speakers or subwoofers, but it conveyed all the requisite weight of percussion instruments without obscuring any detail. The Z7's midrange clarity was similarly impressive—I could hear intimate musical details that, through lesser headphones, were not so apparent/lost.

I could no longer delay the expected gratification of hearing Mozart's piano sonatas. No disappointment. This was truly wonderful, and probably the best and most enjoyable reproduction of an acoustic piano in headphones that I've heard.

I had anticipated that I would still find the Sony's extreme treble muted, but that bias was easily dispelled, treble was present in balance to the rest of the sound.

Quand on lui colle la grosse Berta Virtuose bah ça lui dépote la gueule comme un grand parce qu'il a plein de jus et qu'il te l'envoie de partout. Les basses sont biens mais pas envahissantes, les médiums sont clairs (limpides, transparents) et les aigus s'enjaillent bien comme il faut même si il se disait bien qu'il fallait être un peu déçu par les extrêmes aigus qui ont fermé les gueules.

If the Z7 have a fault, it was not in dynamics or transient response. These headphones can be startling, especially if I foolishly began with the level a bit too high. Somehow, the Z7 always let me know when the volume setting for the music I was playing was not just right. If I set it too high, I got a punch in the face. If I set it too low, the sparkle and presence noticeably dimmed. I haven't had this with any other headphone.

On va pas te la faire à l'envers, le Z7 c'est lui qui te choisit le niveau de volume auquel tu écoutes ta musique sinon c'est un poing dans la tronche ou les aigus se barrent si tu descends trop bas en twerkant le popotard.

Compared to the HD650, the Z7 distinguished itself with its strong, explicit low end, massive scale of sound and the soft, silky smoothness of its treble. Both of these models have a detailed midrange, but the Senns have less heft, even when heft was demanded by the recording. Dynamics for me were better on the Z7.

The Senns and Z7 were capable of throwing big soundstages that seemed to nearly wrap around my head but they both presented the music differently. It is thus impossible to say which of these headphones offered a more accurate depiction of the original recorded event. My preference leans towards the Sony MDR Z7 as the most truthful presentation

Le HD650 et le Z7 qu'ils sont biens à leur manière mais Miss dynamique va à Miss Colombie.... Ah non, c'est marqué sur ma feuille pardon, c'est Miss Z7. Il dit qu'il préfère le Z7 en terme de présentation même si il sait pas lequel des deux entre H et Z te donne l'impression d'entendre la version la précise de la descrpition de l'évenèment enregistré. Bref, lequel te donne l'impression que le concert il est dans ta tête et un peu à côté.

CONCLUSION

Vous voulez pas un whisky d'abord ?

The Sony MDR-Z7 is an impressive headphone. Mated to suitable amplification, it offers honest, organic and detailed sound.
FOR ME it joins a select group of accurate and enjoyable headphones.
Sony has made another statement product. Much more exciting though is that this product harks back to the Sony of old. This is a products that goes its own way in engineering and technology and is peerlessly built. From an audio perspective, this is the sort of engineering that is exciting and singular enough to make one become a fanboy all over again."

Qu'il est beau, qu'il est grand, qu'il est fort, mon ami troll du chaos ! Pardon pour les familles. Le Z7 il est impressionant avec une grosse amplification, il te donne un son honnête, labellisé bio et au détail. C'est un peu le maraîcher du coin qu'il va te permettre de faire une bonne soupe. Honête, Organique et Détaillé. Il a un petit club de potes qu'on appelle les PAC (Précis & Appréciables Casques) mais c'est select à l'entrée donc les autres, vous avez qu'à retourner écouter la musique dans votre bagnole. Et puis, on vante les mérites techniques des ingénieurs de Sony mais en parlant uniquement de la marque et qui se rappelle du bon vieux temps où ils savaient en faire de la musique qu'elle était bonne.

Bref, le mec il est content.

[cvanquick]

[Cabris]

[Kooka]

[cvanquick]

kooka, avec changement de cable et kooka modage, il devrait atteindre des sommets.

Il existe un dynamat modd

http://www.superbestaudiofriends.org/in ... eview.389/

[Climax]

Tinara c'est le Google trad de TN, du grand art

[Kooka]

kooka, avec changement de cable et kooka modage, il devrait atteindre des sommets.
Il existe un dynamat modd

[cvanquick]

Le couple M3/sony MDR 1R (KM) est étonnant en mettant l'EQ sur PERSONNALISE et zéro partout, c'est .

Va falloir aller le chercher.

J'attends SM150 et le NAD HP50 pour voir ce que ça donne.